The Power of Diction in "The Journey to Acceptance"
How does the author of “The Journey to Acceptance” show a favorable bias toward Mendel’s research and an unfavorable bias toward the opinions of Mendel’s scientific peers?
A. The author contrasts Mendel’s theories against the theories of the scientists of Mendel’s day. B. The author does not spend equal time explaining the theories of Mendel’s scientific peers. C. The author uses specific diction such as “profound impact” when referencing Mendel’s work and “very small understanding” when expressing the scientists’ beliefs. D. The author shows how the scientists’ blending theory is similar to Mendel’s research and then refers to Mendel’s work as “the laws of Mendelian inheritance”, making it sound important.
The author shows a favorable bias towards Mendel's research and an unfavorable bias towards the opinions of Mendel's scientific peers
The author shows a favorable bias towards Mendel's research and an unfavorable bias towards the opinions of Mendel's scientific peers, by using specific diction such as “deep impact” when referring to Mendel's work and “very little understanding” when expressing the beliefs of scientists, as shown in option C.
Exploring the Power of Diction in Literature
Diction plays a crucial role in shaping the tone and bias of a piece of writing. In "The Journey to Acceptance," the author strategically employs specific diction to highlight the significance of Mendel's research while diminishing the credibility of his scientific peers.
By describing Mendel's work as having a “profound impact” on the scientific community, the author elevates its importance and establishes a favorable bias towards his research. This choice of words conveys the idea that Mendel's contributions were revolutionary and influential.
On the other hand, when referring to the beliefs of Mendel's scientific peers, the author uses phrases like “very small understanding.” This negative diction diminishes the significance of their opinions, portraying them as lacking depth and insight compared to Mendel's research.
Ultimately, through the strategic use of diction, the author effectively showcases a favorable bias towards Mendel's work and an unfavorable bias towards the opinions of his scientific peers, emphasizing the importance and impact of scientific discovery.