Joe's Trial and Potential Jurors

Which citizens are potential impartial jurors for Joe's case?

Considering what you know about juror selection, which of these citizens are potential impartial jurors for Joe’s case? Check all that apply.

• a retired owner of a small business
• the mother of a young man who is Joe’s age
• one of Joe’s coworkers
• a young man four years older than Joe
• a business owner who is a friend of Joe’s boss

Answer:

1, 2, 4

Explanation:

In Joe's trial, potential impartial jurors should ideally be individuals who have no personal connections or biases that could influence their decision-making in the case. Let's analyze the options:

1. A retired owner of a small business: This individual may be considered impartial as long as their business dealings or any personal relationship with Joe or the case are not significant.
2. The mother of a young man who is Joe’s age: While there may be some potential bias due to the shared age of her son with Joe, she could still be considered impartial if she has no personal involvement in the case.
3. One of Joe’s coworkers: This individual is likely not an impartial juror as they have a direct personal connection to Joe, which could impact their ability to make unbiased decisions.
4. A young man four years older than Joe: This individual could be impartial as long as there are no specific reasons (like personal relationships) that could create bias.
5. A business owner who is a friend of Joe’s boss: This individual is not an impartial juror due to their relationship with Joe's boss, which could lead to bias in favor of Joe.

Therefore, based on the criteria of impartiality, options 1, 2, and 4 – a retired owner of a small business, the mother of a young man who is Joe’s age, and a young man four years older than Joe – are the potential impartial jurors for Joe's case.