Criterion-Related Method for Selection Test Validity

Is the criterion-related method of assessing selection test validity preferred over other methods and why?

True. The criterion-related method is preferred for validating selection tests due to its basis on empirical data, which ensures that test results are reflective or predictive of actual performance in a factual and reliable manner.

Explanation:

The statement that the criterion-related method of assessing selection test validity is preferred over other methods because it is based on empirical data is indeed true. Criterion-related validity relates to whether a test correlates well with a specific outcome; it is either predictive or concurrent. Predictive validity refers to the test's ability to accurately predict future performance, while concurrent validity measures how well the test correlates with a currently observed performance. By using empirical evidence, such as scientific research based on fact and direct experience, analysts can make reliable decisions about the criteria's about the effectiveness of the selection methods.

When it comes to selection tests, for instance, whether in a job setting or academic admissions, it is critical that the tests predict or reflect the actual abilities they're supposed to measure. Empirical data gives a factual basis that helps to figure out the correlation between test scores and job performance or academic success. This can involve statistical analysis of performance data linked to the test results, thus grounding the validity in observed, objective outcomes rather than subjective judgments or theoretical predictions.