U.S. Involvement in Mexico, Hawaii, and China

How was U.S. involvement in Mexico different from that in Hawaii and China?

Was it less violent and geographically closer?

Answer:

Yes, U.S. involvement in Mexico was less violent and geographically closer compared to Hawaii and China.

U.S. involvement in Mexico differed from its involvement in Hawaii and China in a number of ways. Firstly, it was not as violent as the involvement in Hawaii and China. This means that the level of conflict and aggression was lower in Mexico compared to the other two countries.

Secondly, Mexico was much closer to the U.S. than both Hawaii and China. This geographical proximity may have influenced the nature of the relations between the U.S. and Mexico, as it would have been easier for the U.S. to maintain a presence and exercise influence in Mexico due to the shorter distance.

Lastly, Mexico was farther away from Hawaii and China. This distance could have played a role in shaping the extent and type of U.S. involvement in Mexico, as it may have been more challenging for the U.S. to exert control over Hawaii and China compared to Mexico.